Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Class Reflection 4/27
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Learning Reflection 4/20
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Grades as a Discourager
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Learning Reflection 4/13
Monday, April 12, 2010
"Stealing the Mona Lisa" response
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Learning Reflection: 4/6
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Learning Reflection 3/31
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Learning Reflection 3/23
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Learning Reflection 3/11
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Learning Reflection 3/2
Monday, March 1, 2010
Artist Statement: Mural Proposal.
My whimsical mural design will be entirely hand-painted with cool, rich tones of the sea. The painting will extend halfway up the building, and stretch the entire span between two of the barred windows. The design itself pictures a woman's face amidst the tossing waves of the sea, and her hand arching above her face holding a ship in a glass ball. I juxtaposed the human face and the ocean to show how humans and nature are connected on a primitive level. I think it is important to bring natural images into a city such as Syracuse, because nature is not as big of a part of everyday life. Although this image does not have any significant ties to the culture of this community, I have designed it with the intention to spur the imagination of those who view it. I enjoy the freedom of interpretation that images have the power to create; I feel as though it is fun to let loose and create something for the joy of creating.
Friday, February 26, 2010
Learning Reflection 2/23
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Mexican Mural Reading Response: 2/23.
First, based on this article, what would you say were the five essential elements of the Mexican mural movement?
One of the most important elements of the Mexican mural movement is the political aspect. Paintings by the leading artists, such as Diego Rivera and David Alfero Siqueiros, incorporated ideas of the new Mexican government in order to get the population more excited over this new regime. These murals served as a strengthener of Mexico’s national and cultural identity. However, the Mexican mural movement was not confined to the borders of Mexico. Rivera and Siqueiros were also very influential in the United States, and sometimes even controversial in the content they decided to depict in their murals. The public art of this movement is often geared to evoke memories of patriotism through pictures of past war heroes. The avant-garde style was dominant during this movement because artists studied in Europe, where this movement was prominent at the time.
Second, compare and contrast the context of this movement with our present situation in Syracuse in 2010. If we are going to try to make a work of art for the public in Syracuse how are we going to have to approach this problem differently? What has remained the same between our context and the Mexican muralists' context?
I feel as though today’s murals are less politically oriented than they were during the Mexican mural movement. The United States is not undergoing any drastic change in regime like Mexico was in the 1920’s and 30’s. While looking at websites and blogs that contain pictures of modern-day murals, I realize that there is a lot more freedom in the content of this public art. There are many abstract shapes and colors, and it makes me wonder what the meaning behind the mural is. Murals created during the time of the Mexican mural movement most commonly contained people, and sometimes even rulers of the time. The message was often obvious, and many people pictured in the mural were recognizable. I do not think that the people of Syracuse would react in the same way as those living with political upheaval. This is because there are other problems inherent in our society, such as sustainability that needs to be addressed. Murals have the power to convey a message to many people at once because they are located in very public places; we should take advantage of this amazing opportunity and have our voices be heard in the Syracuse community.
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Monday, February 8, 2010






























Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Plato's Republic Response
1. How many chairs are in Kosuth’s artwork? Explain your answer.
Between the chair, the photograph, and the dictionary definition of a chair, I believe that there two chairs evident in Kosuth’s work. I do not consider the definition of a chair to be an actual chair. This is because the words of the definition do not imitate the form of a chair themselves. Yes, the overall description describes a chair’s form; however, there is no visual element on the paper, even though a picture usually forms in one’s mind while reading the definition. This visual image cannot be touched. The chair in the photograph cannot be touched, either. The difference that makes the photographed chair different from the mental image is that the actual photograph pictures a chair that was actually there.
2. Which, if any, would Plato consider the real chair (the photograph, the wooden
chair, the dictionary definition, or none of them)? Explain your answer.
I think Socrates would consider the wooden chair to be the real chair of the three. The photographer of the chair is the imitator, similar to the painter described in the excerpts of Plato’s Republic. Plato would not consider the dictionary definition of a chair, because it, too, is an imitator. “The imitative art is an inferior who marries an inferior, and has inferior offspring.” –Plato’s Republic. The artist who constructed the chair is the one true artist who started the design of the chair in the first place, therefore the wooden chair is the only real chair in Kosuth’s “One and Three Chairs.”















